When I was in art school I was taught that certain artistic expressions were obsolete. The teachers explained that painting in an impressionist style was passé because the impressionists of the 19th century had explored all there was to explore in that genre. This was true, they said, with every preexistent art form. Such tired ways of thinking are still prevalent.
Simplification of the creative process is a post-modernist mode of thinking and uses an erroneous Darwinian model. It says that we consume styles as they are created, like a succession of animals going extinct to make way for superior life forms. Once impressionism, abstract expressionism, and other forms of painting are invented, they live for a season, and then go extinct. One of the many flaws of post-modernism is that such thinking uses the Darwinian metaphor incorrectly.
A more accurate use of the evolutionary model would be to envision art as an ecosystem. As we observe the system, we can expect every niche to eventually be occupied by a relevant art form. Just like the Arctic is populated by unique animals we can expect every artistic niche to be occupied by a type of art that conforms to that niche. We should expect abstract painting to emerge in large urban areas to reflect the international style of large cities. Areas of great natural beauty would foster artists expressing their interaction with that world. Performance art would flourish in areas where political life is perceived as a more dominant reality. The larger reality is that no real artist conforms to any metaphor, no matter how compelling.
Expectation of conformity in the art world is nonsense. Artists cannot be expected to reject authentic expression simply because it is out of fashion. Art can be many things, and art forms such as impressionism, tonalism, regionalism, and social realism can persist long after academics in metropolitan areas declare them extinct.
I practice what I hope is a unique variation of impressionist painting. I live in one of the most beautiful places on earth. To confine myself to the philosophical world of performance art, or other non-painting forms of art would make no sense. Painting will not only remain relevant, but every previous form of painting will be used and reconfigured into new and vibrant styles of painting.
In short, the news of the death of painting has been greatly exaggerated.
If you would like to see my personal painting evolution, including abstraction, impressionism, and marker paintings, please see my Instagram feed here: https://www.instagram.com/bradteare
Brad Teare –January 2018
–AS my exploration of digital media continues I decided to check out Quora. I've answered a few questions relating to art on the site and have found it an interesting resource (most recently I asked the question about how to get attention for one's art outside the usual purview of art galleries. I received many excellent ideas).
Interesting question, and interesting answer. I would also be interested how you would respond to the question how paintings will be relevant in the future.
ReplyDeleteThat's a great question Walter! I will definitely spend some time thinking about that one. If I come up with a good answer I will post it. Many thanks for the idea. Good to hear from you.
DeleteInteresting! I think as long as we the humans dont become extinct, the emotions and expressions that are associated with us stay on this planet!Some humans are gifted enough to express themselves with an visual output and they do it as long as they are able to do it, that is all there to it. The present becomes the past and the future becomes the present.. the cycle goes and it holds good for any art.
ReplyDeleteGood thoughts, Padmaja. Thanks for the comment.
Deleteyou have shown the points very clearly. this is going to help me in many ways...
ReplyDeleteHandyman Dubai
Print A0 Murah
ReplyDeletePrint A1 Murah